[concurrency-interest] JSR-166 Status update

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 12:39:50 -0400

This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C376F0.FCDB3980
Content-Type: text/plain

> 5. I still hope to make a "transitional" dl.u.c/j.u.c package that
> does not rely on JDK1.5 available, although I can't predict when I'll
> have time to do it.

Are we talking reliance on 1.4 then? I do recall seing a newer version with
1.4 as a dependency instead of <1.4.

For the curious, we are "stuck" on 1.3.1 for now due to circumstances out of
our control. We have been using a now rather old version of the package,
without any issues (we only use the thread pool for now).

Thanks,
Gary

------_=_NextPart_001_01C376F0.FCDB3980
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dus-ascii">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
5.5.2654.45">
<TITLE>RE: [concurrency-interest] JSR-166 Status update</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>

&gt; 5. I still hope to make a =
&quot;transitional&quot; dl.u.c/j.u.c package that
 &gt; does not rely on JDK1.5 available, although I =
can't predict when I'll
 &gt; have time to do it.

Are we talking reliance on 1.4 then? I do recall =
seing a newer version with 1.4 as a dependency instead of =
&lt;1.4.

For the curious, we are &quot;stuck&quot; on 1.3.1 =
for now due to circumstances out of our control. We have been using a =
now rather old version of the package, without any issues (we only use =
the thread pool for now).

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Thanks,</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Gary</FONT>
</P>

</BODY>
</HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C376F0.FCDB3980--