Re: Backportcondition variablesand reentrant locks.
TEREKHOV at de.ibm.com
Thu Aug 11 19:17:36 EDT 2005
Wrongly defined. OK, back to lurking.
"David Holmes" <dholmes at dltech.com.au>@cs.oswego.edu on 08/12/2005 12:55:38
Sent by: concurrency-interest-bounces at cs.oswego.edu
To: <concurrency-interest at altair.cs.oswego.edu>
Subject: RE: [concurrency-interest] Re: Backportcondition
variablesand reentrant locks.
This is totally irrelevant for j.u.c Conditions with ReentrantLock. It's
semantics are already defined.
Concurrency-interest mailing list
Concurrency-interest at altair.cs.oswego.edu
More information about the Concurrency-interest