[concurrency-interest] Re: Backportcondition variablesand reentrant locks.

Alexander Terekhov TEREKHOV at de.ibm.com
Thu Aug 11 19:17:36 EDT 2005


Wrongly defined. OK, back to lurking.

regards,
alexander.

"David Holmes" <dholmes at dltech.com.au>@cs.oswego.edu on 08/12/2005 12:55:38
AM

Sent by:    concurrency-interest-bounces at cs.oswego.edu


To:    <concurrency-interest at altair.cs.oswego.edu>
cc:
Subject:    RE: [concurrency-interest] Re:      Backportcondition
       variablesand     reentrant locks.


Alex,

> http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2004/07/68013.php

This is totally irrelevant for j.u.c Conditions with ReentrantLock. It's
semantics are already defined.

David Holmes

_______________________________________________
Concurrency-interest mailing list
Concurrency-interest at altair.cs.oswego.edu
http://altair.cs.oswego.edu/mailman/listinfo/concurrency-interest




More information about the Concurrency-interest mailing list