[concurrency-interest] Synchronizing on AtomicBoolean safe?

Tim Peierls tim at peierls.net
Thu Jun 30 13:09:31 EDT 2005

Nikolai V. Chr. wrote:
> Okay, thanks for the answers. (allthough I did not understand everything..)

Sorry I wasn't clear. The answer to your original question is no: 
AtomicBoolean is not a drop-in replacement for SynchronizedBoolean and it 
doesn't have anything corresponding to getLock().

But could you explain why you think you need that synchronized block in the 
first place?


More information about the Concurrency-interest mailing list