[concurrency-interest] Synchronizing on AtomicBoolean safe?
tim at peierls.net
Thu Jun 30 13:09:31 EDT 2005
Nikolai V. Chr. wrote:
> Okay, thanks for the answers. (allthough I did not understand everything..)
Sorry I wasn't clear. The answer to your original question is no:
AtomicBoolean is not a drop-in replacement for SynchronizedBoolean and it
doesn't have anything corresponding to getLock().
But could you explain why you think you need that synchronized block in the
More information about the Concurrency-interest