[concurrency-interest] spurious wakeups semantics

Jeremy Manson jmanson at cs.purdue.edu
Fri Nov 4 12:14:16 EST 2005

Alexander Terekhov wrote:
>>No one is really sure where they came from.
> http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/birrell87synchronization.html

This paper gives the same implementation that David describes as broken 
in the POSIX rationale, no?


More information about the Concurrency-interest mailing list