[concurrency-interest] spurious wakeups semantics

Jeremy Manson jmanson at cs.purdue.edu
Fri Nov 4 12:14:16 EST 2005


Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> 
>>No one is really sure where they came from.
> 
> 
> http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/birrell87synchronization.html
> 

This paper gives the same implementation that David describes as broken 
in the POSIX rationale, no?

					Jeremy


More information about the Concurrency-interest mailing list