[concurrency-interest] spurious wakeups semantics
TEREKHOV at de.ibm.com
Fri Nov 4 14:47:04 EST 2005
Jeremy Manson <jmanson at cs.purdue.edu> wrote:
> > : The POSIX rationale shows a piece of broken code and uses that to
> > : justify the possibility of spurious wakeups.
> > I have no idea what piece of broken code in the POSIX rationale David
> > was talking about.
> Okay. I was specifically thinking of the one on this page:
Ah that. Well, do you see anything truly broken in
More information about the Concurrency-interest