[concurrency-interest] Language extensions for java.util.concurrent?

Chris Purcell chris.purcell.39 at gmail.com
Fri Nov 11 10:07:16 EST 2005

Just to note,

>   1. They contain well-defined read-sets and write-sets

*Dynamically determined* read-sets and write-sets, if you use the 
current state-of-the-art. I'm not sure what you mean by "well-defined".

>   3. They do not contain nested transactions (or only limited forms)

Nested atomic blocks are usually supported.


More information about the Concurrency-interest mailing list