extensions for java.util.concurrent?
chris.purcell.39 at gmail.com
Fri Nov 11 10:07:16 EST 2005
Just to note,
> 1. They contain well-defined read-sets and write-sets
*Dynamically determined* read-sets and write-sets, if you use the
current state-of-the-art. I'm not sure what you mean by "well-defined".
> 3. They do not contain nested transactions (or only limited forms)
Nested atomic blocks are usually supported.
More information about the Concurrency-interest