[concurrency-interest] Assignment of references atomic?
chris.purcell.39 at gmail.com
Wed Oct 12 18:52:33 EDT 2005
> It is possible for a thread calling getObject in this case to see a
> partially constructed object; in other words, see an up-to-date value
> of 'object' but a stale/inconsistent/invalid version of the object's
> state, because object was not properly published.
> In short, no, you cannot do what you want to do. You have to
Just to clarify here: you can synchronize by using the "volatile"
keyword, right? You do not need to use the "synchronized" keyword?
More information about the Concurrency-interest