[concurrency-interest] atomic references
dcholmes at optusnet.com.au
Wed Aug 23 00:37:52 EDT 2006
> However, it is not clear if AtomicReference performs an == or an
> equals() comparison. As we know v1 == v2 can be entirely different
> from v1.equals(v2). Can anyone shed some light on which type of
> comparison is done?
If you think about the purpose of atomics it can only be a reference
comparison ==. These are "raw" memory operations. And this is documented in
> Furthermore, assuming the former (==), is it not incongruous for
> AtomicReference to do a reference comparison while other atomics do a
> value comparison (on primitives)? Im curious about this one.
== is always a value comparison - for AtomicReference the value being
compared is a reference.
For non-objects identity and equivalence are the same thing.
More information about the Concurrency-interest