[concurrency-interest] Synchronization question

Tim Peierls tim at peierls.net
Tue Jun 27 17:51:53 EDT 2006

No harm and no potential deadlocks.


On 6/27/06, Ryan LeCompte <Ryan.LeCompte at pangonetworks.com> wrote:
>  Thanks! I'll make the field volatile then. There is absolutely no harm in
> making a field volatile and using it inside of another synchronized
> method/block, correct? No potential deadlocks simply due to the variable
> being made volatile?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/attachments/20060627/5725755a/attachment.html 

More information about the Concurrency-interest mailing list