dl at cs.oswego.edu
Thu May 18 19:50:02 EDT 2006
Boehm, Hans wrote:
> The real issue here may be the current documentation for
Presciently, Marting Buchholz filed a documentation bug for
weakCompareAndSet last week, so we should be able to do this soon.
> which seems to be lacking the
> requisite warnings, like: "This provides weaker memory visibility
> guarantees than compareAndSet. If you have any doubt whether you should
> be using weakCompareAndSet or compareAndSet, then use compareAndSet."
Thanks. This is a good start.
Additional wording suggestions (from everyone!) would be welcome.
More information about the Concurrency-interest