[concurrency-interest] Question about
"happens-before" and reordering
Jeremy Manson
jmanson at cs.purdue.edu
Fri May 19 12:15:04 EDT 2006
Jeremy Manson wrote:
>
> 2) The initialized field should probably be final (which would mean that
> you could not put the "initialized = false" line in, but you probably
> don't want that line there anyway, as the default value is false, and
> moving the constructor around / adding more constructors will cause
> confusion). Otherwise, you could use reflection to set it.
>
Whoops! I didn't mean that last bit! But it should probably be final
anyway.
Jeremy
More information about the Concurrency-interest
mailing list