tim at peierls.net
Fri May 19 16:09:56 EDT 2006
No, but STPE can still do the job if you use it to schedule the submission
of work to a secondary (non-scheduled) executor service. When a lot of work
triggers at once, all it has to do is put it on the secondary executor's
On 5/19/06, Jeff Schultz <jws at cs.mu.oz.au> wrote:
> Does anyone have a ScheduledExecutorService that uses a varying number
> of Threads? ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor's "acts as a fixed-sized pool
> using corePoolSize threads and an unbounded queue" is not what I need
> for a particularly bursty workload.
> Jeff Schultz
> Concurrency-interest mailing list
> Concurrency-interest at altair.cs.oswego.edu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Concurrency-interest