[concurrency-interest] AtomicReference weakCompareAndSet "Mayfailspuriously"?

Bob Lee crazybob at crazybob.org
Sun May 28 23:10:36 EDT 2006

Oops. David answered my question. ;)


On 5/28/06, Bob Lee <crazybob at crazybob.org> wrote:
> On 5/28/06, Pete Soper <pete at soper.us> wrote:
> > The race is between the write of int[] and int[]{1} but it's enabled by
> > the lack of atomicity of the CAS.
> The CAS itself is atomic, right? The problem now is with the int[]
> which is exposed to two threads with no barrier. If we were doing a
> weak CAS of an int, this wouldn't be an issue, right?
> Bob

More information about the Concurrency-interest mailing list