[concurrency-interest] Question on JCIP annotations

Holger Hoffstätte holger at wizards.de
Thu Oct 12 08:01:14 EDT 2006

Tim Peierls wrote:
> We were trying to keep the number of annotations to a minimum, otherwise
> this would have been called @Stateless.

Agreed - I realize it's a corner case and just wanted to ask for some
clarification (with an eye towards Findbugs). @ThreadSafe makes more sense
when @Immutable implies multiple objects.


More information about the Concurrency-interest mailing list