[concurrency-interest] ConcurrentLinkedBlockingQueue ?
rbalamohan
rbalamohan at sonoasystems.com
Mon Sep 11 23:38:48 EDT 2006
The results look really promising.
On a similar note, I was wondering why we don't have "PRIORITY BASED
LINKED QUEUE"
This might be useful for creating work load with priority associated
with it and submitting to the threadpool executor.
~Rajesh.B
On Mon, 2006-09-11 at 14:53 -0700, Hanson Char wrote:
> Testing on an AMD Opteron dual processor, the CLBQ is on average 72%
> faster than the LBQ using the test harness. Please see the attached
> pdf for more details.
>
> Hanson
>
> On 9/10/06, Hanson Char <hanson.char at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Outstanding! Could you please make up-to-date versions
> of this class and
> its unit test available over the web in a more
> permanent location? That
> way you don't have to send updates by mail..
>
>
>
> Latest source:
>
> http://svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/beanlib/trunk/beanlib/src/net/sf/beanlib/util/concurrent/ConcurrentLinkedBlockingQueue.java
>
> Test classes:
>
> http://svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/beanlib/trunk/beanlib-
> test/src/net/sf/beanlib/util/concurrent/
>
>
> Hanson
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Concurrency-interest mailing list
> Concurrency-interest at altair.cs.oswego.edu
> http://altair.cs.oswego.edu/mailman/listinfo/concurrency-interest
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/attachments/20060912/c93056d1/attachment.html
More information about the Concurrency-interest
mailing list