[concurrency-interest] ConcurrentLinkedBlockingQueue ?

rbalamohan rbalamohan at sonoasystems.com
Mon Sep 11 23:38:48 EDT 2006


The results look really promising. 

On a similar note, I was wondering why we don't have "PRIORITY BASED
LINKED QUEUE"

This might be useful for creating work load with priority associated
with it and submitting to the threadpool executor.

~Rajesh.B

On Mon, 2006-09-11 at 14:53 -0700, Hanson Char wrote:

> Testing on an AMD Opteron dual processor, the CLBQ is on average 72%
> faster than the LBQ using the test harness.  Please see the attached
> pdf for more details.
> 
> Hanson
> 
> On 9/10/06, Hanson Char <hanson.char at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>                 Outstanding! Could you please make up-to-date versions
>                 of this class and 
>                 its unit test available over the web in a more
>                 permanent location? That
>                 way you don't have to send updates by mail..
>         
>         
>         
>         Latest source: 
>         
>         http://svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/beanlib/trunk/beanlib/src/net/sf/beanlib/util/concurrent/ConcurrentLinkedBlockingQueue.java
>         
>         Test classes:
>         
>         http://svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/beanlib/trunk/beanlib-
>         test/src/net/sf/beanlib/util/concurrent/
>         
>         
>         Hanson
>         
>         
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Concurrency-interest mailing list
> Concurrency-interest at altair.cs.oswego.edu
> http://altair.cs.oswego.edu/mailman/listinfo/concurrency-interest
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/attachments/20060912/c93056d1/attachment.html 


More information about the Concurrency-interest mailing list