[concurrency-interest] ConcurrentLinkedBlockingQueue ?

Hanson Char hanson.char at gmail.com
Tue Sep 12 00:15:25 EDT 2006


Is j.u.PriorityQueue what you are looking for ?

Hanson

On 9/11/06, rbalamohan <rbalamohan at sonoasystems.com> wrote:
>
>  The results look really promising.
>
> On a similar note, I was wondering why we don't have "PRIORITY BASED
> LINKED QUEUE"
>
> This might be useful for creating work load with priority associated with
> it and submitting to the threadpool executor.
>
> ~Rajesh.B
>
>
> On Mon, 2006-09-11 at 14:53 -0700, Hanson Char wrote:
>
> Testing on an AMD Opteron dual processor, the CLBQ is on average 72%
> faster than the LBQ using the test harness.  Please see the attached pdf for
> more details.
>
> Hanson
>
> On 9/10/06, *Hanson Char* <hanson.char at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>  Outstanding! Could you please make up-to-date versions of this class and
> its unit test available over the web in a more permanent location? That
> way you don't have to send updates by mail..
>
>
>
> Latest source:
>
>
> http://svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/beanlib/trunk/beanlib/src/net/sf/beanlib/util/concurrent/ConcurrentLinkedBlockingQueue.java
>
> Test classes:
>
>
> http://svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/beanlib/trunk/beanlib-test/src/net/sf/beanlib/util/concurrent/
>
>
> Hanson
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________Concurrency-interest mailing listConcurrency-interest at altair.cs.oswego.eduhttp://altair.cs.oswego.edu/mailman/listinfo/concurrency-interest
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/attachments/20060911/359e11a6/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the Concurrency-interest mailing list