[concurrency-interest] BoundedPriorityBlockingQueue ?

Hanson Char hanson.char at gmail.com
Tue Sep 12 21:58:49 EDT 2006


Hi David,

But didn't you point out the normal blocking BQ put() semantics in a
queue-full situation for a bounded PBQ would lead to madness ?

If so, why not avoid addressing BQ and create something that might be useful
but not a kind of BQ ?

Hanson

On 9/12/06, David Holmes <dcholmes at optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>
>  Hanson,
>
> We are miscommunicating. If we created a bounded PBQ then it need only
> have normal BQ semantics. With such a bounded PBQ the user would use put()
> or offer() based on their own needs regarding what should happen when the
> queue is full.
>
> Cheers,
> David
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/attachments/20060912/5c2b2f26/attachment.html 


More information about the Concurrency-interest mailing list