[concurrency-interest] ThreadPoolExecutor's allowCoreThreadTimeOut
Moran Avigdor
moran at gigaspaces.com
Sun Aug 26 05:26:59 EDT 2007
I have noticed some strange behavior using the ThreadPoolExecutor when
moving to java 1.6 (1.6.0_02-b06 on windows xp)
Core pool threads were being terminated although I was explicitly
setting the core pool size:
ThreadPoolExecutor(int corePoolSize, int maximumPoolSize, long
keepAliveTime, TimeUnit unit,
BlockingQueue<Runnable> workQueue,
ThreadFactory threadFactory)
I noticed it when JConsole was up and monitoring the thread consumption.
After my 1 min timeout, all threads were terminated.
In 1.6, the new allowCoreThreadTimeOut(boolean value) will in fact
explain this behavior if value is set to true - But I am not explicitly
calling it, but instead using the constructor above.
I should not that on a linux running 1.6.0-rc-b104 it seemed to have
behaved as expected.
Is anyone aware of such a fix or a known issue?
Thanks in advance.
---
Moran
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/attachments/20070826/7be99675/attachment.html
More information about the Concurrency-interest
mailing list