[concurrency-interest] question the about the JMM

Doug Lea dl at cs.oswego.edu
Mon Dec 10 07:22:02 EST 2007

Jaroslav Sevcik wrote:
> Doug, we have already discussed this before, and I still maintain that 
> the JMM is flawed with respect to transformations.

Right. It's probably best to move that part of discussion
(i.e., diagnosing and fixing possible technical flaws in JMM
rules for transformations) to the JMM list
(Javamemorymodel-discussion at mcfeely.cs.umd.edu --
See http://mailman.cs.umd.edu/mailman/listinfo/javamemorymodel-discussion)


More information about the Concurrency-interest mailing list