[concurrency-interest] question the about the JMM

Doug Lea dl at cs.oswego.edu
Mon Dec 10 07:22:02 EST 2007


Jaroslav Sevcik wrote:
> Doug, we have already discussed this before, and I still maintain that 
> the JMM is flawed with respect to transformations.
> 

Right. It's probably best to move that part of discussion
(i.e., diagnosing and fixing possible technical flaws in JMM
rules for transformations) to the JMM list
(Javamemorymodel-discussion at mcfeely.cs.umd.edu --
See http://mailman.cs.umd.edu/mailman/listinfo/javamemorymodel-discussion)

-Doug


More information about the Concurrency-interest mailing list