[concurrency-interest] ForkJoinExecutor.invoke and ForkJoinTask.invoke

Doug Lea dl at cs.oswego.edu
Sat Dec 15 11:35:50 EST 2007


Tim Peierls wrote:
> 
> I still think renaming FJTask.invoke() to forkJoin() would make this 
> framework slightly easier to learn and reduce the potential for 
> confusion with FJPool.invoke(task). 

At first this name sounded too wrong to me -- shouldn't it be
forkAndJoin()? (precedent: atomic.getAndAdd()) Which itself
sounds odd.  But just forkJoin() is somehow now starting to sound
OK to me, and you are right that it may forestall
some confusion. Any other opinions?

-Doug




More information about the Concurrency-interest mailing list