[concurrency-interest] jcip annotations

Dhanji R. Prasanna dhanji at gmail.com
Fri Dec 21 11:08:17 EST 2007


On 12/22/07, Tim Peierls <tim at peierls.net> wrote:
>
>  [Dhanji] I cannot see any value in them being retained at runtime and in
> > fact a potential nuisance to reflection and debugging...
> >
> >
> > [Tim] I'm curious, how is the presence of a runtime annotation a
> > nuisance?
> >
>
> On Dec 20, 2007 11:27 AM, Shaffer, Darron <Darron_Shaffer at stercomm.com>
> wrote:
>
> >  The presence of a runtime annotation means one more jar file to ship
> > with a product.  And one more to run past legal if it's a commercial
> > product.
> >
>
> OK, but those are production issues that can be addressed at packaging
> time. I was curious what Dhanji meant by "potential nuisance to reflection
> and debugging"?
>


Nothing more than that they add distraction and clutter to an increasingly
cluttered field of runtime-annotations.


Dhanji.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/attachments/20071222/4ff3ac92/attachment.html 


More information about the Concurrency-interest mailing list