[concurrency-interest] Exception handling with ParallelArray
dl at cs.oswego.edu
Fri Dec 28 08:57:34 EST 2007
Neal Gafter wrote:
> I don't get it. (2), above, seems like a reason to include fancier
> support for exception tunneling (the generic exception type can be
> placed in the throws clause of ParallelArray.apply), rather than a
> reason not to.
Maybe so. I don't think I've seen a proposal that boils down
to this sort of selective tunneling without adding more declaration
overhead in those cases it isn't used though.
More information about the Concurrency-interest