[concurrency-interest] Exception handling with ParallelArray

Doug Lea dl at cs.oswego.edu
Fri Dec 28 08:57:34 EST 2007

Neal Gafter wrote:
> I don't get it.  (2), above, seems like a reason to include fancier 
> support for exception tunneling (the generic exception type can be 
> placed in the throws clause of ParallelArray.apply), rather than a 
> reason not to.

Maybe so. I don't think I've seen a proposal that boils down
to this sort of selective tunneling without adding more declaration
overhead in those cases it isn't used though.


More information about the Concurrency-interest mailing list