[concurrency-interest] RFC -- Java7 java.util.concurrent plans
joe.bowbeer at gmail.com
Wed Dec 10 11:30:06 EST 2008
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 8:13 AM, Bob Lee wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 8:02 AM, Joe Bowbeer wrote:
>> ConcurrentReferenceHashMap is more consistent with the naming of its
>> sibling classes, such as ConcurrentHashMap, whereas ReferenceMap is more
>> consistent with the naming of interfaces.
> We should definitely consider consistency, but it doesn't trump all other
> factors, like making the name twice as long and much less catchy and
> memorable. "Joe, I think you want a concurrent reference hash map here," vs,
> "Joe, I think you want a reference map here."
Right. And as you know;) I prefer to reference instances by their interface
name rather than their class name.
Btw, would ReferenceMap implement ConcurrentMap? I think that'd be
unexpected given its name.
I think this motivates ConcurrentReferenceMap at the least.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Concurrency-interest