[concurrency-interest] Impossible Exception?

Sam Berlin sberlin at gmail.com
Mon Jan 14 10:04:28 EST 2008


Yes, this is exactly what the check is intended for (essentially a
circular dependency).  That's why the stack trace threw me for a loop
-- if it was recursively enterring get, it would have appeared in the
trace.

Sam

On Jan 14, 2008 10:01 AM, Gregg Wonderly <gregg at cytetech.com> wrote:
> Sam Berlin wrote:
> > Wow --  Thanks very much for pointing that out, David & Bob.  We in
> > fact have had errors reported from constructing that singleton...  I
> > never thought to connect the two, but it definitely explains things.
>
> There is also a path if createObject() recursively enters get() it seems to me.
> But it sounds like that path wouldn't happen.
>
> Gregg Wonderly
>


More information about the Concurrency-interest mailing list