[concurrency-interest] thread queueing qn

Dhanji R. Prasanna dhanji at gmail.com
Sat Jan 19 18:30:46 EST 2008


On 1/19/08, Rémi Forax <forax at univ-mlv.fr> wrote:
>
> Dhanji R. Prasanna a écrit :
> > - as an alternative, I don't want to force/trust users to expose a
> > locking API
> and it can don't work at all because lot of persistence storages use
> equals() semantics (two persistent objects are equals using equals())
> and synchronized use == semantic.


Oh that's a very important point! Thank you, Remi =)

Dhanji
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/attachments/20080120/4ff6c52c/attachment.html 


More information about the Concurrency-interest mailing list