[concurrency-interest] Multi consumer queue

Joe Bowbeer joe.bowbeer at gmail.com
Tue Apr 7 21:01:16 EDT 2009

On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Brett Bernstein wrote:

> Sometimes a slightly larger cost each time can be better (particularly with
> a low latency requirement) than a GC every so often, even if the total cost
> of the allocations + the GC is less.  To the point that certain
> implementations are better in certain scenarios, I feel like having the
> option of using a non-allocating lock would be very useful.  In the
> multithreaded applications I write these days I would never use anything
> else.
> -Brett

Can you run benchmark these alternatives on a JVM and post the results?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cs.oswego.edu/pipermail/concurrency-interest/attachments/20090407/de4b2555/attachment.html>

More information about the Concurrency-interest mailing list