[concurrency-interest] Latches and safe handoff

Dhanji R. Prasanna dhanji at gmail.com
Tue Dec 15 19:23:36 EST 2009

On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Tim Peierls <tim at peierls.net> wrote:

> It is safe for the obvious otherThreadPerformer suspects, i.e., something
> involving Thread.start/join, Executor.execute, or things like that. (You'll
> need holder to be final.)

I think it's an executor underneath somewhere, yea.

> Seems like you're working very hard to avoid Future/Callable, though.
Think of it as a thought experiment. =)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cs.oswego.edu/pipermail/concurrency-interest/attachments/20091216/ff31033c/attachment.html>

More information about the Concurrency-interest mailing list