[concurrency-interest] Concurrent stack
jim.andreou at gmail.com
Thu Jan 22 17:26:32 EST 2009
It's already there: SynchronousQueue.
put() for push
take() for pop
Ok, this is cheating, but without synchronization (like in Stack, i.e.
sequential pushs and pops), you have no defined order to expect anyway.
2009/1/23 Guy Korland <gkorland at gmail.com>
> Are there any plans to add the concurrent package a concurrent stack?
> The current implementation exists as part of the JRE is a synchronized.
> While there're few well known algorithms for non-blocking stack.
> Guy Korland
> Concurrency-interest mailing list
> Concurrency-interest at cs.oswego.edu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Concurrency-interest