[concurrency-interest] Concurrent stack

Jim Andreou jim.andreou at gmail.com
Thu Jan 22 17:26:32 EST 2009


It's already there: SynchronousQueue.

put() for push
take() for pop

Ok, this is cheating, but without synchronization (like in Stack, i.e.
sequential pushs and pops), you have no defined order to expect anyway.

Dimitris

2009/1/23 Guy Korland <gkorland at gmail.com>

> Hi,
>
> Are there any plans to add the concurrent package a concurrent stack?
> The current implementation exists as part of the JRE is a synchronized.
> While there're few well known algorithms for non-blocking stack.
>
> --
> Guy Korland
>
> _______________________________________________
> Concurrency-interest mailing list
> Concurrency-interest at cs.oswego.edu
> http://cs.oswego.edu/mailman/listinfo/concurrency-interest
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cs.oswego.edu/pipermail/concurrency-interest/attachments/20090123/376322dc/attachment.html>


More information about the Concurrency-interest mailing list