[concurrency-interest] Concurrent stack
jim.andreou at gmail.com
Thu Jan 22 17:34:14 EST 2009
Dah, this is wrong, since that would include waiting for the opposite
action. Ignore this, thanks.
O/H Jim Andreou έγραψε:
> It's already there: SynchronousQueue.
> put() for push
> take() for pop
> Ok, this is cheating, but without synchronization (like in Stack, i.e.
> sequential pushs and pops), you have no defined order to expect anyway.
> 2009/1/23 Guy Korland <gkorland at gmail.com <mailto:gkorland at gmail.com>>
> Are there any plans to add the concurrent package a concurrent stack?
> The current implementation exists as part of the JRE is a
> While there're few well known algorithms for non-blocking stack.
> Guy Korland
> Concurrency-interest mailing list
> Concurrency-interest at cs.oswego.edu
> <mailto:Concurrency-interest at cs.oswego.edu>
More information about the Concurrency-interest