[concurrency-interest] Deadlock definition question

Marcelo Fukushima takeshi10 at gmail.com
Sun Jun 28 13:12:54 EDT 2009


i guess it would be an impasse-like deadlock but a deadlock nonetheless

On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Peter Veentjer<alarmnummer at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I have a corner case question about the definition of a deadlock.
>
> In most literature I see that there at least 2 threads need to be
> involved. But what if there is a single thread and a non reentrant
> lock? As thread still can get in a 'deadlock' like sitation when he
> tries to reacquire the lock he already owns. So 1 thread would be
> sufficient as well I would say.
>
> Peter
> _______________________________________________
> Concurrency-interest mailing list
> Concurrency-interest at cs.oswego.edu
> http://cs.oswego.edu/mailman/listinfo/concurrency-interest
>



-- 
http://mapsdev.blogspot.com/
Marcelo Takeshi Fukushima


More information about the Concurrency-interest mailing list