[concurrency-interest] Atomic assignment

Mark Thornton mthornton at optrak.co.uk
Thu May 7 17:29:28 EDT 2009


I was sure that the problem of (non)atomic assignment to volatile longs 
and doubles had been fixed, but this bug report suggests otherwise:

http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4023233

Anyone know for sure?

Mark Thornton



More information about the Concurrency-interest mailing list