[concurrency-interest] Atomic assignment

David Holmes davidcholmes at aapt.net.au
Thu May 7 18:40:07 EDT 2009


Hi Mark,

That bug is (or became) a RFE for the spec to make all accesses to
double/long atomic and that is not going to happen hence the "will not fix".
There are a number of other bugs that pertain to atomic access to volatile
long/double eg: 4247780 which was fixed back in 1.2.2

Thanks
David Holmes

> -----Original Message-----
> From: concurrency-interest-bounces at cs.oswego.edu
> [mailto:concurrency-interest-bounces at cs.oswego.edu]On Behalf Of Mark
> Thornton
> Sent: Friday, 8 May 2009 7:29 AM
> To: concurrency-interest at cs.oswego.edu
> Subject: [concurrency-interest] Atomic assignment
>
>
>
> I was sure that the problem of (non)atomic assignment to volatile longs
> and doubles had been fixed, but this bug report suggests otherwise:
>
> http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4023233
>
> Anyone know for sure?
>
> Mark Thornton
>
> _______________________________________________
> Concurrency-interest mailing list
> Concurrency-interest at cs.oswego.edu
> http://cs.oswego.edu/mailman/listinfo/concurrency-interest




More information about the Concurrency-interest mailing list