[concurrency-interest] Interesting story from Dave Dice

Péter Kovács peter.kovacs.1.0rc at gmail.com
Mon May 25 05:43:21 EDT 2009

1. If an operation/class/method/whatever is not declared to be
thread-safe, you can assume it is not. Correct? (If it is declared to
be so, you can, perhaps, be optimistic and assume it is.)

2. If a variable (an array in this case) is written to, the variable
is not "effectively immutable". (Probably useless of nitpicking on the
meaning of "effectively".)

Is this really novel?


On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Brian Goetz <brian at briangoetz.com> wrote:
> http://blogs.sun.com/dave/entry/memcpy_concurrency_curiosities
> _______________________________________________
> Concurrency-interest mailing list
> Concurrency-interest at cs.oswego.edu
> http://cs.oswego.edu/mailman/listinfo/concurrency-interest

More information about the Concurrency-interest mailing list