[concurrency-interest] Interesting story from Dave Dice

Boehm, Hans hans.boehm at hp.com
Mon May 25 20:32:49 EDT 2009

> From: Péter Kovács
> ... Apart 
> from the awkward name for this JNI constant, it appears to be 
> a pure operator error not to use JNI_ABORT for an immutable array.
Agreed, at least if there may be concurrent readers.  Anything else results in a data race, which is by definition a bug on the C/C++ side, and bad practice on the Java side.

If the array were updated, I don't see how this could be correct in the presence of data races, since the update may have happened in place, and the C code makes no guarantees in the presence of data races.


More information about the Concurrency-interest mailing list