[concurrency-interest] concurrent counter : incrementAndGet

Jeff Hain jeffhain at rocketmail.com
Sat Aug 13 18:57:45 EDT 2011


Hello.

   To continue on the subject of concurrent counters, does anyone
know one that could be used instead of AtomicLong.incrementAndGet()
(possibly providing non-monotonic results, or monotonic but with gaps),
and would scale better?

   I tried to do something in that direction, but it's sometimes actually worse
(which still surprises me: I'm not totally aware of what I carefully made yet 
;).

Regards,

Jeff
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cs.oswego.edu/pipermail/concurrency-interest/attachments/20110813/8259cd60/attachment.html>


More information about the Concurrency-interest mailing list