[concurrency-interest] ConcurrentHashMapV8

√iktor Ҡlang viktor.klang at gmail.com
Fri Dec 23 11:23:35 EST 2011


We have a 48-core box (4 x Magny Cours)

Cheers,
√

On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Nathan Reynolds <nathan.reynolds at oracle.com
> wrote:

>  I've been thinking about running such a test on a dual Westmere system
> with a total of 24 logical cores.  I've been thinking about doing this for
> a long time so I wouldn't hold your breath.  I am definitely interested in
> your results.
>
> Nathan Reynolds<http://psr.us.oracle.com/wiki/index.php/User:Nathan_Reynolds>| Consulting Member of Technical Staff |
> 602.333.9091
> Oracle PSR Engineering <http://psr.us.oracle.com/> | Server Technology
>
> On 12/23/2011 7:36 AM, Dr Heinz M. Kabutz wrote:
>
> I would like to run some performance tests comparing CHMv8 to the CHM in
> Java 7 and to Cliff Click's non-blocking hash map implementation.  However,
> I do not have access to hardware that will do the test justice.  Would any
> of you be able to run some tests for me on machines in excess of 50 cores?
> The more the better.  If so, please contact me directly.
>
> Regards
>
> Heinz
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Concurrency-interest mailing list
> Concurrency-interest at cs.oswego.edu
> http://cs.oswego.edu/mailman/listinfo/concurrency-interest
>
>


-- 
Viktor Klang

Akka Tech Lead
Typesafe <http://www.typesafe.com/> - Enterprise-Grade Scala from the
Experts

Twitter: @viktorklang
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cs.oswego.edu/pipermail/concurrency-interest/attachments/20111223/4b12c35c/attachment.html>


More information about the Concurrency-interest mailing list