[concurrency-interest] AtomicReferenceFieldUpdater vs Unsafe
dl at cs.oswego.edu
Thu Nov 17 07:55:09 EST 2011
On 11/17/11 07:49, √iktor Ҡlang wrote:
> Portability of Unsafe constructions is not really a problem.
> We frequently communicate with all production JVM implementors
> to help ensure that they are correctly supported.
> Alright, that's a good clarification, I've always avoided it from compatibility
> Is this case the same with Android?
Android runs unmodified java.util.concurrent, so at least supports
the Unsafe methods that we use.
More information about the Concurrency-interest