[concurrency-interest] Concurrency-interest Digest, Vol 82, Issue 21

Guy Korland gkorland at gmail.com
Sun Nov 20 02:42:45 EST 2011


Not all the issues are solved, but it seems like most of the issues have
good answers.
Also, notice that in .NET they have issues which Java doesn't have like
Native code.

Guy

> Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 09:21:23 +0000ך
> From: Mark Thornton <mthornton at optrak.com>
> To: concurrency-interest at cs.oswego.edu
> Subject: Re: [concurrency-interest] Transactional memory on GCC 4.7.0,
>        what about Java?
> Message-ID: <4EC77513.5040807 at optrak.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"
>
> On 19/11/11 07:00, Guy Korland wrote:
>> Hardware support might be great but it seems like it won't be
>> generally available in the near future, while STM is becoming,
>> widely available see Scala, Intel C++, and GCC 4.7... I think this
>> process should start in Java also.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Guy Korland
>>
> Yet Microsoft abandoned STM.net after 6 years development.
>
>
http://www.bluebytesoftware.com/blog/2010/01/03/ABriefRetrospectiveOnTransactionalMemory.aspx
>
> Have the issues changed or the has the focus been narrowed to something
> which is achievable?
>
> Mark Thornton
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cs.oswego.edu/pipermail/concurrency-interest/attachments/20111120/428ff481/attachment.html>


More information about the Concurrency-interest mailing list