[concurrency-interest] padding in Exchanger
vitalyd at gmail.com
Tue Jan 17 09:33:13 EST 2012
For what it's worth, +1 on the annotation proposal.
Curious - which i7 arch has 128 byte cache line? I know Netburst used to
have 128 as a blocked pair of two 64 byte lines, but didn't see anything on
the newer chips.
On Jan 17, 2012 8:24 AM, "Doug Lea" <dl at cs.oswego.edu> wrote:
> On 01/17/12 08:01, √iktor Ҡlang wrote:
>> What is the outlook for getting the contended annotation in the java spec?
> I have expected an OpenJDK Enhancement Proposal (JEP -- see
> http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/0**) on this to appear any day now
> for about four months. People at Oracle reading this list
> should look into what it holding it up :-)
> Concurrency-interest mailing list
> Concurrency-interest at cs.**oswego.edu <Concurrency-interest at cs.oswego.edu>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Concurrency-interest