[concurrency-interest] generalise computeIfAbsent() for ConcurrentMap

Aleksey Shipilev aleksey.shipilev at gmail.com
Wed Jun 20 12:07:05 EDT 2012

On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Doug Lea <dl at cs.oswego.edu> wrote:
> On 06/20/12 11:26, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> Yes, I saw that coming. Continuing on my point, if computeIfAbsent()
>> ought to be the placeholder for the usual code people do around
>> putIfAbsent(), it seems to be presumed mapper function is side-effect
>> free.
> That was part of our reasoning for not including these methods
> in the first place. But we now know that many users disagree.

Thanks. So, no-side-effects requirement is too strict for this case
(apart from being generally unenforceable in Java), and actually
devalvates the benefit of having computeIfAbsent() as the separate


More information about the Concurrency-interest mailing list