[concurrency-interest] @Contended (JEP-142)

Aleksey Shipilev aleksey.shipilev at oracle.com
Thu Nov 29 04:43:50 EST 2012

On 11/28/2012 08:42 PM, Gregg Wonderly wrote:
> Going down that path, makes me feel like having it in a more "public"
> package would be a better choice.  The name "Contended" is now going to
> be a "reserved" name for many people, when used in annotation form.  So,
> why not just make it a publicly defined "annotation" which has
> appropriate implementation in appropriate environments?

Any concrete suggestion? j.u.c.Contended? j.u.c.hints.Contended?


More information about the Concurrency-interest mailing list