[concurrency-interest] @Contended (JEP-142)

Stanimir Simeonoff stanimir at riflexo.com
Thu Nov 29 05:11:12 EST 2012


>>Any concrete suggestion? j.u.c.Contended? j.u.c.hints.Contended?
j.u.c.expert.Contended?
I'd go with "hints".

Stanimir


On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Aleksey Shipilev <
aleksey.shipilev at oracle.com> wrote:

> On 11/28/2012 08:42 PM, Gregg Wonderly wrote:
> > Going down that path, makes me feel like having it in a more "public"
> > package would be a better choice.  The name "Contended" is now going to
> > be a "reserved" name for many people, when used in annotation form.  So,
> > why not just make it a publicly defined "annotation" which has
> > appropriate implementation in appropriate environments?
>
> Any concrete suggestion? j.u.c.Contended? j.u.c.hints.Contended?
> j.u.c.expert.Contended?
>
> -Aleksey.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Concurrency-interest mailing list
> Concurrency-interest at cs.oswego.edu
> http://cs.oswego.edu/mailman/listinfo/concurrency-interest
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cs.oswego.edu/pipermail/concurrency-interest/attachments/20121129/7d6b8fda/attachment.html>


More information about the Concurrency-interest mailing list