[concurrency-interest] RRWL with 'bad' Thread.getId() implementations

Martin Buchholz martinrb at google.com
Tue Jun 25 17:20:13 EDT 2013


On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Aleksey Shipilev <
aleksey.shipilev at oracle.com> wrote:

> On 06/26/2013 01:13 AM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
> On the serious note, we need to frame this discussion a bit. Do you want
> the bug against RRWL with the testcase Chris had came up with? (That is,
> do you agree this is the bug in RRWL?)
>

I think I agree this is a small bug in RRWL, but I suspect any attempt to
cure it would be worse than the disease.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cs.oswego.edu/pipermail/concurrency-interest/attachments/20130625/8a64dea6/attachment.html>


More information about the Concurrency-interest mailing list