[concurrency-interest] Should CopyOnWriteArrayList implement RandomAccess?

Gustav Åkesson gustav.r.akesson at gmail.com
Thu Jun 27 03:37:35 EDT 2013

Because if it would have been removed it would also break people's code
(e.g. those assigning a COWAL instance to a RandomAccess type).

Best Regards,

Gustav Åkesson

On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Nitsan Wakart <nitsanw at yahoo.com> wrote:

> > I agree that the original decision to have COWAL implement RandomAccess
> was a (very small) mistake, but it's too late to fix now.
> I agree it's small, but how is it hard to fix?
> _______________________________________________
> Concurrency-interest mailing list
> Concurrency-interest at cs.oswego.edu
> http://cs.oswego.edu/mailman/listinfo/concurrency-interest
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cs.oswego.edu/pipermail/concurrency-interest/attachments/20130627/f927deac/attachment.html>

More information about the Concurrency-interest mailing list