[concurrency-interest] RFR: 8065804: JEP 171: Clarifications/corrections for fence intrinsics
martinrb at google.com
Mon Dec 1 15:13:24 EST 2014
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Aleksey Shipilev
<aleksey.shipilev at oracle.com> wrote:
> I think "implies the effect of C++11" is too strong wording. "related"
> might be more appropriate.
I've been struggling to come up with better wording. The latest webrev says
+ * Corresponds to C11 atomic_thread_fence(memory_order_acquire).
but I'm not totally happy with that either. "Essentially equivalent to" ?
More information about the Concurrency-interest