[concurrency-interest] DirectByteBuffers and reachabilityFence

Vitaly Davidovich vitalyd at gmail.com
Wed Dec 9 12:27:28 EST 2015


As Gil said, it should be spilled as there are no actual uses of it.

On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Andrew Haley <aph at redhat.com> wrote:

> On 12/09/2015 04:16 PM, Vitaly Davidovich wrote:
> >>
> >> an implicit implication that 'this' must remain reachable until after
> the
> >> last instruction in each of its instance methods
> >
> > Why wouldn't this work, at least as a compromise?
>
> It would, but it would hurt performance because of increased register
> pressure.
>
> Andrew.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cs.oswego.edu/pipermail/concurrency-interest/attachments/20151209/653fb3d5/attachment.html>


More information about the Concurrency-interest mailing list