[concurrency-interest] DirectByteBuffers and reachabilityFence
vitalyd at gmail.com
Wed Dec 9 12:27:28 EST 2015
As Gil said, it should be spilled as there are no actual uses of it.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Andrew Haley <aph at redhat.com> wrote:
> On 12/09/2015 04:16 PM, Vitaly Davidovich wrote:
> >> an implicit implication that 'this' must remain reachable until after
> >> last instruction in each of its instance methods
> > Why wouldn't this work, at least as a compromise?
> It would, but it would hurt performance because of increased register
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Concurrency-interest