[concurrency-interest] DirectByteBuffers and reachabilityFence

Vitaly Davidovich vitalyd at gmail.com
Wed Dec 9 13:55:48 EST 2015


Let me rephrase -- most DBB usage is such that the DBB is live until all
things using it are.

On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Alexandre De Champeaux <adc at quartetfs.com>
wrote:

>
>
>> Ok, I buy that.  I can't help but wonder how DBB authors decided it's ok
>> to release it to the public like this though.  Granted, I can't think of a
>> (realistic) scenario where allocating a DBB that's immediately garbage is
>> normal.
>>
>
> I don't see why only DBB that are immediately garbage would be affected.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cs.oswego.edu/pipermail/concurrency-interest/attachments/20151209/52fd2ba2/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Concurrency-interest mailing list