[concurrency-interest] DirectByteBuffers and reachabilityFence

Andrew Haley aph at redhat.com
Tue Dec 15 05:17:38 EST 2015


On 15/12/15 04:47, thurstonn wrote:
> Is there a legitimate, empirical performance reason that  the JLS couldn't
> be changed to require that reachability extend throughout the lifetime of an
> instance method?

That question was asked and answered on this list a couple of
days ago.

Andrew.



More information about the Concurrency-interest mailing list