[concurrency-interest] DirectByteBuffers and reachabilityFence
vitalyd at gmail.com
Tue Dec 15 07:37:51 EST 2015
To be fair, no empirical evidence has been presented; there is speculation
of scenarios it may hurt but nothing concrete.
I also think the bigger obstacle to changing this behavior is getting all
the different JVM implementations modified and not really the performance
On Tuesday, December 15, 2015, Andrew Haley <aph at redhat.com> wrote:
> On 15/12/15 04:47, thurstonn wrote:
> > Is there a legitimate, empirical performance reason that the JLS
> > be changed to require that reachability extend throughout the lifetime
> of an
> > instance method?
> That question was asked and answered on this list a couple of
> days ago.
> Concurrency-interest mailing list
Sent from my phone
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Concurrency-interest