[concurrency-interest] On the specification of park()
jason at tedor.me
Sat Sep 24 12:02:24 EDT 2016
I think this is due to the notion of spurious wakeups (
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 11:51 AM Andrew Haley <aph at redhat.com> wrote:
> The spec says
> > The park method may also return at any other time, for "no reason",
> Looking at the OpenJDK implementation, I don't think it will do that.
> What is the reason park() is specified this way?
> Concurrency-interest mailing list
> Concurrency-interest at cs.oswego.edu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Concurrency-interest